A strong CORU CPD reflection names the specific new or enhanced learning (not the course title), shows how you used it in your own practice and what difference that made for service users or your service, and claims credits that match that learning, not the time in the room. Each activity needs both a learning outcome and an impact on practice entry.
Key points
- CORU reviews four things: learning activities totalling 30 credits of new or enhanced learning, evaluation and reflection, a review of learning needs, and a plan for the next 12 months.
- For each activity, the record asks what you learned and how you have integrated it into your practice. Those two answers are your reflection.
- Credits are self-determined at one per hour of new or enhanced learning. Repeating the same mandatory training may not produce any.
- The result is compliant or non-compliant, and CORU gives no written feedback, so your record has to speak for itself.
- The rewrites below are illustrative, not real registrants. Never include anything that could identify a service user or colleague.
What does CORU check in a CPD reflection at audit?
If you are selected for audit, you submit your CPD record through your profile on CORU's registrant system, and the record must cover four parts: implementation of learning activities that achieved 30 CPD credits of new or enhanced learning, evaluation and reflection of the learning achieved, a review of learning needs for the next 12-month period, and planned learning activities for that period. The minimum is 30 credits in every 12-month period, and professions with a 24-month audit period still have to show at least 30 credits in each 12-month block. (Our CORU CPD requirements hub sets out the full requirement.)
The CORU CPD Audit Policy (V3, approved by the Council on 4 November 2025) gives you 30 working days from notification to submit your record or a deferral request. The CORU Executive then reviews the record against those four requirements, and the outcome is either compliant or non-compliant. CORU's audit FAQs state plainly that there is "no scope" for CORU or a Registration Board to give qualitative feedback on a record. You will not get a note saying "expand your reflection". The record either shows the learning or it does not.
Those 2025 figures, from CORU's annual report, cover physiotherapists, social workers, occupational therapists, optometrists and dispensing opticians, and exclude 136 registrants who were removed, deferred or ineligible. They are reassuring, but they are not a reason to write the bare minimum: a clear record also protects you if anything in it is ever questioned. If you want to know what happens on the deadline side, including deferrals and non-compliance, our guide to CORU CPD audit deadlines, deferrals and non-compliance covers that process in detail.
Who is next
| Profession | Audit period | Audit date |
|---|---|---|
| Dietitians, radiographers, speech and language therapists | 1 Nov 2024 to 31 Oct 2026 | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Social care workers | 1 Dec 2025 to 30 Nov 2026 | 1 Dec 2026 |
| Occupational therapists; optometrists and dispensing opticians | 1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2027 | 1 Apr 2027 |
| Social workers | 1 Jun 2025 to 31 May 2027 | 1 Jun 2027 |
| Physiotherapists | 1 Oct 2025 to 30 Sep 2027 | 1 Oct 2027 |
Social care workers face a first-ever audit with its own features; see our guide to CPD for social care workers ahead of the first CORU audit.
How to write the Learning Outcome and Impact on Practice fields
CORU's record has an "Implement" part (date and time spent, type of learning activity, name of the activity, CPD credits) and an "Evaluate & Reflect" part with two prompts per activity.
Learning outcome
"What have you learnt through completing this activity? How have your skills and knowledge improved or developed?"
Impact on practice
"How have you integrated this learning into your practice? How has this learning made a difference to your capability and performance in your role?"
The optional CPD Record Template uses the same fields as the portal, so you can draft in the template and copy across. It is a recording tool only; you do not submit it. The policy adds that supporting documents are not required and should not be attached. That is exactly why the two narrative fields carry so much weight: there is no certificate sitting beside them to do the work.
Questions the Registration Boards suggest
The Registration Boards' CPD Support documents (most approved in 2019) offer reflective prompts. The Speech and Language Therapists Registration Board version lists eight "Evaluate and Reflect" questions, including "What have I learnt?", "Did I achieve my learning outcomes?", "How have I applied this learning at work?", "What was the impact of this learning for service users and/or quality service provision?" and "What lessons can I take from this experience?" The same Support documents describe three reflective models: Rolfe, Freshwater and Jasper's "What? So What? Now What?", Gibbs' reflective cycle, and Bain's 5Rs.
You do not have to name a model in your record. In practice, "What? So What? Now What?" maps neatly onto the two fields: What and So what go into the learning outcome, and Now what goes into impact on practice. Pharmacists work through a similar staged structure, shown in our IIOP CPD cycle example. CORU's general CPD FAQs add two useful points: reflection can be on a positive or a negative learning experience, and "the key element is reflecting on how the event or activity will impact your practice in the future".
How many CPD credits should a reflection claim?
CORU's rule is that credits are self-determined on the basis that one hour of new or enhanced learning equals one credit, and that you can attribute any fraction of an hour to an activity. The same FAQ warns that attending the same mandatory training again "may not facilitate any new or enhanced learning", that simply having students on placement is not enough to claim credits, and that surplus credits cannot be carried forward. Our separate explainer on CORU CPD credits and what counts works through the edge cases (part-time work, leave, non-practising registrants); here the focus is on how the credit figure and the reflection support each other.
The Radiographers Registration Board's own exemplar is a useful calibration. It records a 2-day, 12-hour IV cannulation course as 6 credits, a 2-hour webinar as 0.5 credits and a 30-hour radiation dose audit as 4 credits, while a mandatory online Children First course, taken before starting a new role in an HSE department, is recorded at 1 credit for 1.5 hours. The message is that the credit figure reflects the learning, not the clock.
A simple proportionality test
Read your learning outcome aloud. If it would take you 30 seconds to say and you have claimed 6 credits, either the writing is too thin or the claim is too high. Adjust one of them.
CORU reflection example 1: SLT journal club
Self-directed and work-based learning is often under-recorded because there is no certificate. Professional reading, journal clubs and discussions with colleagues all appear in the Board Support documents' list of possible CPD activities.
Weak entry · 3 credits claimed
Learning outcome: Attended journal club on dysphagia screening. Very interesting and useful discussion of the latest evidence.
Impact on practice: Will use this in my practice going forward.
Audit-ready entry · 2 credits claimed
Learning outcome: I spent about an hour reading the review and its supplementary tables, then took part in a 1-hour journal club. Using a structured appraisal checklist for the first time, I saw that the included studies used different reference standards, which makes the pooled accuracy figures harder to apply to our ward. I also improved my ability to explain sensitivity and specificity in plain terms.
Impact on practice: I now check which reference standard a screening study used before quoting its results to the team. I wrote a half-page summary for the department's shared folder and, with my clinical lead, agreed to review how our local screening referral criteria are explained to nursing colleagues at the next team meeting.
- Credits: 2 credits for about 2 hours of genuinely new learning, not 3 for the whole afternoon.
- Specific learning: names a skill gained (structured appraisal) and an insight (different reference standards), not "the latest evidence".
- Integration: a changed habit, a shared output and an agreed next step that someone else could confirm.
- Safe content: no patient, ward or colleague is identifiable.
Notice that the strong entry does not overstate. It does not claim the department changed its screening tool. It records what the registrant did and what is planned, which is honest and still clearly shows learning in use.
CORU reflection example 2: radiographer, repeat mandatory training
Mandatory refreshers are where many records lose credibility. Mandatory training is not excluded as such (the Radiographers Registration Board exemplar includes a mandatory course), but the credit must be tied to what was new to you.
Weak entry · 6 credits claimed
Learning outcome: Completed all mandatory training. Up to date for another year.
Impact on practice: Compliant with hospital requirements.
Audit-ready entry · 1 credit claimed
Learning outcome: Most of the day repeated content I already knew, so I have claimed only the new element: a 1-hour practical session on the transfer equipment recently introduced in our department, including how its weight limits and positioning steps differ from the old system.
Impact on practice: I now complete the pre-transfer checks in the new sequence and use the equipment for every assisted trolley-to-table transfer I lead. I showed two colleagues who had missed the session how to set it up and flagged to my manager that the quick-reference card was missing from one scanning room, which has since been replaced.
- Honest credit: the registrant separates repeated content from new learning, which is exactly what the CORU FAQ asks for.
- Compliance is not learning: "up to date" describes attendance, not development.
- Visible change: new routine, peer teaching and a small system fix.
Claiming 1 credit can feel like a loss, but it makes the other 29 more believable. It also forces you to look for richer learning elsewhere, which is the point of the scheme.
Want a second pair of eyes on your record structure?Our two-hour CORU CPD course covers reflection, impact, learning needs and a 12-month plan for a CORU record.
See what's coveredWhere records fell short in earlier CORU audits
CORU published trend reports on the first audits under an earlier CPD model (24-month cycles from 2015, with requirements such as eight reflective practice reports and at least one activity every three months). That model has since been replaced by the current four-part record, so treat the findings as lessons about writing, not as current rules.
Learning not articulated
In the first, voluntary social work audit, 90% of those who missed the recording standard did not articulate personal learning, often giving an overview of the course objectives instead.
Description, not appraisal
Only 44% of portfolios met the recording standard on first submission, and an assessor noted reflective accounts were often "recollection/description rather than critical appraisal".
Credits for time, not learning
Assessors found high credit totals without matching descriptions of learning, and confusion between time spent and new learning.
Mistakes that weaken an otherwise good record
- Copying course objectives. The provider's learning outcomes describe the course, not you.
- Future tense only. "I will apply this" is a plan. Where you can, record what you have already done, even if small.
- Identifiable detail. CORU's FAQ says reflective records should not contain confidential or identifying information.
- Activities outside the audit period. CORU's audit page states that only activities completed within the audit period count.
- All formal courses. Supervision, peer review, reading and service development are legitimate CPD and often produce the strongest impact statements.
- Assuming a provider is "CORU-approved". CORU says it has no role in the development, delivery or accreditation of CPD activities; you judge relevance and credits yourself, whichever online CPD courses or other activities you choose.
Closing the loop: review of learning needs and the plan
Two of the four audit requirements look forward, and the best place to find material for them is the reflections you have already written. The record's review-plan prompts are "What do I want or need to learn in the next 12 months?" and "What learning activities will I do to achieve this in the next 12 months?" CORU's registrant guide adds that Review & Plan must be completed for each 12-month period, and asks for planned activities for months 13 to 24, so registrants on a 24-month audit period should expect to complete it twice.
Harvest the "now what"
List the gaps your impact entries exposed: the SLT's appraisal skills, the social worker's recording of supports offered.
Turn each into a learning need
One sentence, specific to your role: "Confident appraisal of diagnostic accuracy studies in dysphagia."
Attach a realistic activity
Name the activity type and when: a module, a supervision goal, a peer review, an audit.
Say how you will know
A brief outcome, such as leading the next journal club or a supervisor's review of your notes.
The SLT Board's exemplar shows this well: each of its three plan items pairs a learning need with a named activity, such as an online ethics course for confidentiality or a further service project to build on earlier improvement training. Note that the Board exemplars deliberately include more than 30 credits to show a range of activities; the SLT one totals 55. You need 30 in each 12-month period, not 55.
Turning your next activity into evidence: a 15-minute routine
The trend reports showed the cost of reconstructing a year of learning from memory. Writing within a week of the activity is the simplest fix. CORU's FAQs also ask you to keep your CPD documentation for as long as you are on the Register, even though you do not upload it at audit.
If you are a few months from your audit date and your record is mostly titles and hours, start with your five largest credit claims and rewrite those first. Activities where you learned from routine work, such as case discussions, can be developed using the approach in our Work-Based Learning and Professional Competence course (written around the Medical Council framework, but the reflective method transfers), and the Reflection for Fitness to Practise course goes deeper into the models CORU's Boards cite.
Courses for a stronger CORU reflection record
Each course can be recorded as CPD where it gives you new or enhanced learning. You decide the credits.
CORU CPD: Building an Audit-Ready Portfolio
- Reflection and impact on practice for a CORU record
- Reviewing learning needs and building a 12-month plan
- 20 MCQs and a certificate
Reflection for Fitness to Practise
- Writing reflection that shows insight, not excuses
- Using Gibbs, Rolfe and Johns
- Building a reflective portfolio
Clinical Supervision and Professional Development Planning
- Running effective reflective supervision
- Turning learning needs into a measurable development plan
- Handling hard feedback
Work-Based Learning and Professional Competence
- Turning routine clinical work into recorded learning
- Writing reflection on work-based activity
- Built around the Medical Council framework; the reflective method transfers
Check your Board's guidance on what you can record.
Frequently asked questions
How long should a CORU CPD reflection be?
CORU sets no word count and its exemplars vary from a few lines to several paragraphs. The test is proportionality: the learning outcome and impact entries should be detailed enough to justify the credits claimed. A 0.5-credit webinar needs far less than a 6-credit course.
Does CORU require a reflective model such as Gibbs?
No. The Registration Boards' CPD Support documents describe Rolfe's "What? So What? Now What?", Gibbs' cycle and Bain's 5Rs as tools, but the record only asks what you learned and how you integrated it into practice. A model can help you structure your thinking.
Can I reflect on something that went badly?
Yes. CORU's CPD FAQs say reflective practice may be on a positive or negative learning activity. Focus on what you learned and how it will change your practice, and leave out anything that could identify a service user or colleague.
Can I copy my reflection from the CORU template into the portal?
Yes. CORU says the optional CPD Record Template fields match the portal fields, so you can draft in the template and copy the content across. You do not submit the template itself.
Should I upload my certificates with the audit?
No. The CPD Audit Policy says supporting documents are not required and should not be attached. Keep certificates and notes for your own records for as long as you are on the Register.
Will CORU tell me how to improve my reflections?
No. CORU's audit FAQs say there is no scope for qualitative feedback on a record; you are told only whether it is compliant or non-compliant. That is why it is worth checking your entries against the four requirements before you submit.
Can one reflection cover a long programme or postgraduate module?
You can record it as one activity, but for a large credit claim it is clearer to split the programme into modules or blocks and reflect on each, so the depth of writing matches the credits for each part.
Does reflective writing itself count as CPD time?
CORU credits are based on hours of new or enhanced learning. Time spent writing up a record is not in itself new learning; reflection that produces genuine new insight, for example in supervision or a structured case review, can be recorded as an activity in its own right.
Official sources used in this guide (17)
- CORU, CPD Audit (web page, accessed October 2026)
- CORU, CPD Audit Policy V3 (2025)
- CORU, CPD Audit FAQs (web page, accessed October 2026)
- CORU, Frequently Asked Questions: CPD (web page, accessed October 2026)
- CORU, Registrant Guide to Completing a CPD Audit (undated)
- CORU, CPD Record Template (March 2026)
- CORU, Annual Report 2025 (2026)
- Social Workers Registration Board, Guidance on Continuing Professional Development (2019)
- Social Workers Registration Board, Support for Continuing Professional Development (2019)
- Speech and Language Therapists Registration Board, Support for Continuing Professional Development (2019)
- Speech and Language Therapists Registration Board, CPD Record Exemplar (2023)
- Social Care Workers Registration Board, CPD Record Exemplar (2023)
- Radiographers Registration Board, Radiographer CPD Audit Record Exemplar (2020)
- Radiographers Registration Board, CPD Audit Trend Report (2018)
- Social Workers Registration Board, CPD Audit Trend Report (2018)
- Irish Statute Book, Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015, section 3 (2015)
- Courts Service, New decision-making support services available as the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act comes into being (2023)
Checked against the official sources above in October 2026. Rules and fees change, so confirm current requirements with your regulator or scheme.